Don't Leave Uber to the Courts – Bloomberg


A London tribunal’s ruling final week that Uber drivers aren’t self-employed was hailed as a victory by the firm’s critics. The courtroom upheld an earlier finding that Uber resorted to “fictions” and “twisted language” in denying its obligations as an employer, and that its declare to be a service linking 30,000 small companies to their clients was “faintly ridiculous.”

Clear as which may appear, the judgment does not settle the matter. The authorized battle will proceed in the U.Okay., as in lots of different jurisdictions, with no sign of ending. This is what occurs when courts are requested to apply outdated legal guidelines to a quickly altering labor market.

A San Francisco decide presiding over a similar case put it properly: The jury, he stated, is being “handed a square peg and asked to choose between two round holes.”

The essential query is for lawmakers to resolve. Uber’s drivers aren’t staff in the previous-usual sense — they usually aren’t unbiased contractors in the previous-common sense both. This is a brand new type of employment relationship. It wants to be acknowledged, and controlled, accordingly. 

Source link


About Author

Leave A Reply